The Portland Group
Oakridge Top Right

Since 1986 - Covering the Fastest Computers
in the World and the People Who Run Them

Language Flags

Visit additional Tabor Communication Publications

Enterprise Tech
HPCwire Japan

Blog: From the Editor

From the Editor | Main Blog Index

GOP Blocks Federal Funding for Science and Technology

An ultra-partisan political climate and an economy that has Republican lawmakers wringing their hands over deficit spending have conspired to sink the COMPETES reauthorization bill. On Wednesday, the House GOP voted down H.R. 5325, the bill that would have committed more than $40 billion in federal science and technology programs over the next three years.

Designed to double federal spending in science and technology over the next decade, the 2007 America COMPETES Act targeted money for basic and applied science research at national research labs and universities. The US federal agencies involved in such work include the National Science Foundation, National Institute for Standards and Technology, and the Department of Energy's Office of Science, and NASA, among others. Under the proposed authorization, they would have seen some of their healthiest budgets in years.

If you've been following this saga, you'll know that COMPETES has never been fully funded. But with a very science-friendly administration and Congress in charge, this looked like the year when the government would finally get the program on track. A few weeks ago I exchanged some emails with Peter Harsha, of the Computing Research Association, who has been diligently tracking the passage of the legislation. At that time (late April), the Republicans were adding dozens of amendments to the bill and threatening even more. Harsha felt that this was just the minority looking to score some political points, but "with the full expectation that their amendments will get voted down and that they'll still support the bill when it comes to final passage." Well, it didn't quite work out that way.

Despite general bipartisan support for the bill in committee, Republicans blocked its passage with a minority of votes. The Democrats miscalculated by bringing the legislation to the floor under a procedure that kept Republicans from tacking on more amendments. Under the rules, that meant a two-thirds majority would be needed for passage. And even though 15 Republicans plus all the Democrats voted in favor of the measure, the final 261-148 vote was 12 short of the supermajority needed.

The depressing news doesn't stop there. H.R. 5325 was actually a compromise bill from the original H.R. 5116, which provided for $85 billion worth of funding for five years instead of $47 billion for three. The new bill also included banning the use of COMPETES funds to pay the salaries of federal employees caught looking at pornography at work -- because, as every good Republican knows, you can't do innovative research if you're perusing porn all day. OK, maybe that's true, but I want to see the science.

Anyway, in spite of cutting the funding by nearly half and injecting some righteousness into the bill, conservative lawmakers still voted to kill it. Rep. Ralph Hall (R-Texas), the top Republican on the House Science and Technology (ST&T) Committee, claimed the bill was still too costly, given the state of the federal deficit. Herbert Hoover would have been proud.

It's pretty easy to chalk all this up to election-year politicking, but given the GOP's general uneasiness with science -- stem cell research, global climate change, and so on -- it can't be too surprising when they balk at funding such work. According to a 2009 Pew Research poll, only six percent of scientists identify themselves as Republicans, so when the GOP votes against these types of programs, they're not exactly abandoning their base.

Fortunately, the reauthorization bill is not completely dead. ST&T Committee Chairman Bart Gordon (D-Tenn.) intends to reintroduce the bill at a later date, hoping for a more favorable outcome. You can keep tabs on this legislative soap opera over at the Computing Research Association blog.

Posted by Michael Feldman - May 20, 2010 @ 6:52 PM, Pacific Daylight Time

Michael Feldman

Michael Feldman

Michael Feldman is the editor of HPCwire.

More Michael Feldman

Recent Comments

No Recent Blog Comments

Sponsored Whitepapers

Breaking I/O Bottlenecks

10/30/2013 | Cray, DDN, Mellanox, NetApp, ScaleMP, Supermicro, Xyratex | Creating data is easy… the challenge is getting it to the right place to make use of it. This paper discusses fresh solutions that can directly increase I/O efficiency, and the applications of these solutions to current, and new technology infrastructures.

A New Ultra-Dense Hyper-Scale x86 Server Design

10/01/2013 | IBM | A new trend is developing in the HPC space that is also affecting enterprise computing productivity with the arrival of “ultra-dense” hyper-scale servers.

Sponsored Multimedia

Xyratex, presents ClusterStor at the Vendor Showdown at ISC13

Ken Claffey, SVP and General Manager at Xyratex, presents ClusterStor at the Vendor Showdown at ISC13 in Leipzig, Germany.

HPCwire Live! Atlanta's Big Data Kick Off Week Meets HPC

Join HPCwire Editor Nicole Hemsoth and Dr. David Bader from Georgia Tech as they take center stage on opening night at Atlanta's first Big Data Kick Off Week, filmed in front of a live audience. Nicole and David look at the evolution of HPC, today's big data challenges, discuss real world solutions, and reveal their predictions. Exactly what does the future holds for HPC?