November 19, 2009
Even though IBM's Roadrunner machine got dethroned from its number one spot on the TOP500 list, a research team at the company made some big news this week at the Supercomputing conference, announcing they had "performed the first near real-time cortical simulation of the brain that exceeds the scale of a cat cortex." In essence, they made a computer act like a brain, or at least a part of one.
The simulation was performed with the "Dawn" Blue Gene/P super at Lawrence Livermore National Lab, using 147,456 CPUs and 144 terabytes of DRAM. Even with all that computational horsepower and memory, the simulation still ran 100 to 1,000 times slower than a real-time cat. Obviously the project has a ways to go before you can replace Tabby with the electronic version at Radio Shack.
Actually, the long-term goal is to create a computer system that encompasses the range of capabilities exhibited by a brain -- and I think we're talking human-type brains now -- including sensation, perception, action, interaction and cognition. And this all has to be implemented with the energy-efficiency and footprint (headprint?) of the organic version. The researchers are envisioning an implementation based on low-power "synaptronic" chips using nanotechnology and advanced phase change memory and magnetic tunnel junctions. What they have today is basically a workbench to support that effort.
So unless I'm missing something, the end game here appears to be to create computers that have human levels of intelligence. The business case is pretty obvious: replace people with machines. In the press release, IBM has managed to make it sound mundane:
Businesses will simultaneously need to monitor, prioritize, adapt and make rapid decisions based on ever-growing streams of critical data and information. A cognitive computer could quickly and accurately put together the disparate pieces of this complex puzzle, while taking into account context and previous experience, to help business decision makers come to a logical response.
I'm guessing the first logical response would be to replace any remaining employees with additional cognitive computers. Hmm... I wonder if IBM has thought this through.
Posted by Michael Feldman - November 18, 2009 @ 11:31 PM, Pacific Standard Time
Michael Feldman is the editor of HPCwire.
No Recent Blog Comments
10/30/2013 | Cray, DDN, Mellanox, NetApp, ScaleMP, Supermicro, Xyratex | Creating data is easy… the challenge is getting it to the right place to make use of it. This paper discusses fresh solutions that can directly increase I/O efficiency, and the applications of these solutions to current, and new technology infrastructures.
10/01/2013 | IBM | A new trend is developing in the HPC space that is also affecting enterprise computing productivity with the arrival of “ultra-dense” hyper-scale servers.
Ken Claffey, SVP and General Manager at Xyratex, presents ClusterStor at the Vendor Showdown at ISC13 in Leipzig, Germany.
Join HPCwire Editor Nicole Hemsoth and Dr. David Bader from Georgia Tech as they take center stage on opening night at Atlanta's first Big Data Kick Off Week, filmed in front of a live audience. Nicole and David look at the evolution of HPC, today's big data challenges, discuss real world solutions, and reveal their predictions. Exactly what does the future holds for HPC?